发烧论坛

注册

 

发新话题 回复该主题

郎朗签约SONY古典,为了更广阔的在电子多媒体方面的发展 [复制链接]

1#

It comes as a huge relief, then, to find Lang Lang taking Beethoven seriously, and working with Eschenbach in crafting a very respectable pair of concerto performances. There are some magical moments here: the close of the First Concerto's opening-movement development section, both slow movements (particularly that of the Fourth Concerto), and the dreamier moments in the latter work's finale. Lang Lang plays the pants (trousers?) off of Beethoven's cadenzas in both works, and interacts affectingly with the various sections of the orchestra. In short, this is intelligent, characterful pianism.

这个是著名的挑剔评论员David Hurwitz对朗朗贝1,4钢协的评价,算是对朗朗的褒奖之词。
分享 转发
TOP
2#

同样的,David Hurwitz对朗朗的拉2和帕狂给予了猛烈的抨击,尤其是对他在自由速度及音量的掌握上。不过,他也对朗朗的拉3和在卡内基的演出给出了肯定。以下是部分摘抄:

The Paganini Rhapsody fares no better. There seems to be no guiding intelligence at work here at all, and I don't mean that Lang Lang is not intelligent or talented. I refuse to believe that his career is entirely a media creation, as some have claimed, and I was impressed by much of his Carnegie Hall debut concert. His Rachmaninov Third Concerto (on Telarc) was decent. He just doesn't reveal any of his more positive qualities on this outing. Let me explain with some concrete examples: The first four variations are all in the same tempo, Allegro vivace. So are variations eight and nine. They don't sound it, at least as compared to Variation 13. This brings back the opening theme almost literally, and it's marked simply Allegro, but here it's noticably livelier than the original Tempo 1, which is exactly what Rachmaninov does not want, because he plans to leave room to speed up even further for the Scherzando variation fifteen (whose Più vivo directive Lang Lang largely ignores).
TOP
3#

回复 100# zuoyi 的帖子

嗯,褒贬我都列举了  呵呵
TOP
发新话题 回复该主题