原帖由 cluytens 于 2012-6-2 13:31:00 发表
開心水兄
這段跟一些玩家得到的心得，是完全相反的結論
不妨在版上多多交流
如果一開始就下斷言，會草率了些........... |
说起这个问题，我其实一直在回避和“金耳朵”的正面碰撞。
金耳朵到底有没有？反正我没见过，我也没见过在哪个权威机构的Listening Test中出现过，相反，他们的结论却往往是“至今未发现‘金耳朵’”。
一片盲听测试论文的Abstract：
Claims both published and anecdotal are regularly made for audibly superior sound quality for two-channel audio encoded with longer word lengths and/or at higher sampling rates than the 16-bit/44.1-kHz CD standard. The authors report on a series of double-blind tests comparing the analog output of high-resolution players playing high-resolution recordings with the same signal passed through a 16-bit/44.1-kHz "bottleneck." The tests were conducted for over a year using different systems and a variety of subjects. The systems included expensive professional monitors and one high-end system with electrostatic loudspeakers and expensive components and cables. The subjects included professional recording engineers, students in a university recording program, and dedicated audiophiles. The test results show that the CD-quality A/D/A loop was undetectable at normal-to-loud listening levels, by any of the subjects, on any of the playback systems. The noise of the CD-quality loop was audible only at very elevated levels. |
坦率地讲，就我的设备我的耳朵，区分320和EAC都要看情况。原本的EAC必须是从很优秀的CD上抓取出来的，我才能把它和320区分开。
至于说192 24和对其重采样后的得到的44.1 16，我试过很多次，根本听不出区别。
或许在很多人眼里，咱根本就是个木耳朵吧。。。
SSD，我也试过，读取速度快，发热量小，噪音小，但也仅限于此。对于声音有什么影响，我完全没听出来。
我做过试验，方法很简单。同一台1394解码器，两台笔记本，分别装的SSD和传统机械硬盘。
在一台机器上听过以后，就把解码器拔下来接到另一台机器上。一台机器听音时，另一台就拿到远处。
反复试验多次，实事求是地说，我什么区别都没听出来。
这仅仅是我的实验，在某英文
论坛上，我也看到有不少关于SSD的讨论，结论都和我的一致。
当然，这只是我的一家之言而已，诸位烧友看看便是。。。
